Alex takes a look at the Carmelo Anthony trade, and how his Melo fandom is justifiably illogical.<\/em><\/p>\n There is a simple test I have that easily sorts the logical people from the illogical. Ask any culturally cognizant person you know which superhero they would choose to be, should that choice ever be presented to them. Some people will instantly say Batman because Batman is cool as shit. Some people will say Spider-Man because he might be even cooler. But the only logical people are the ones who answer with \u201cSuperman.\u201d Nobody really wants to be Superman because it\u2019s not the cool choice, but it\u2019s the correct answer. Pretty much anything your favourite superhero can do, Superman can do even better (unless DC Comics has a superhero that can throw Kryptonite really far and I just don\u2019t know about it). In a recent podcast, I said I would rather be Spider-Man, because he has been my favourite superhero since I was a kid, and swinging around Manhattan just always looked so goddamn fun. James\u2019 response: \u201cYou know Superman can swing, too, right?\u201d<\/p>\n I know that Superman could swing on things if he wanted. Or, you know, just fly instead. I know that he could also probably build the Batcave in a day if he wanted to. In fact, I have posed this same question to many friends over the last year or so and always found myself unsatisfied with any non-Superman answer. There is simply no argument to be had. But that doesn\u2019t stop me from reflexively answering Spider-Man every time.<\/p>\n The basketball equivalent of this (groan now, non-sports fans) is pretty clear. If you were asked which modern basketball player whose talents you could have, the answer should always be LeBron James. The lack of a post game may be his Kryptonite, but he can do pretty much everything else you would want him to, and he\u2019s still young enough that he doesn\u2019t really need a post game anyway. Coming into the 2003 NBA Draft, however, I was certain Carmelo Anthony was going to be a better player, and that Dwyane Wade might even be as good as LeBron. Obviously, I was incorrect. I picked Spider-Man again.<\/p>\n I have been a fairly dedicated basketball fan for about a decade now, but my favourite players have never really been the absolute best in the league. Shaq was way too dominant for me to be a fan. Kobe\u2019s game never did anything for me. Had I been a basketball fan in the 1990s, I suspect I would have praised the merits of Scottie Pippen more often than those of Michael Jordan. Around 2000, when my Sunday afternoons began to be consumed by NBC\u2019s triple-headers of NBA basketball, my favourite players were Paul Pierce, Baron Davis, and Ray Allen. I still stand by two of those choices, and at least Davis occasionally has an awesome beard<\/a>. These players were never the absolute best in the game; I just loved watching them play. I enjoy Paul Pierce\u2019s vaguely athletic old man\u2019s game. I loved that Baron Davis was a little chubby guy dunking on established superstars like Kevin Garnett<\/a>. I like a good shooter, and Ray Allen\u2019s quick release<\/a> is the jump shot equivalent of Marion Cotillard\u2019s glorious visage.<\/p>\n Like those three favourites, Carmelo Anthony has never been the best player in the NBA, but he is certainly in the top 10 and also seems to generally be significantly underrated. Melo is like the NBA\u2019s version of Russell Crowe. There are few people better than him at his profession, but people can\u2019t get past the fact that he threw a phone at a dude once, or that he punches like an infant, or that he made an appearance in a DVD entitled Stop Snitchin\u2019. Anthony has made plenty of mistakes in his life, but it\u2019s not like I\u2019m a fan of athletes to watch them make smart life choices. I\u2019m not a fan of Carmelo Anthony because he chooses to recycle; I\u2019m a fan of his jump shot.<\/p>\n Anthony\u2019s game doesn\u2019t really condense into fancy highlights all that well. He\u2019s quick, but he\u2019s not that quick. He\u2019s strong, but not that strong. He is not an incredibly strong, athletic player like LeBron James, and Melo has few \u201cI Can\u2019t Believe I Just Saw That\u201d plays (although he does have this<\/a>). Anthony is not spectacular really, but he is still insanely good at basketball. His mid range shot is exceptional. He uses his better-than-average strength in the post to either get to the hoop for a layup or shoot turnaround jumpers, but his go-to move involves catching the ball about 15-20 feet from the basket. He\u2019ll then probably do some jab steps, maybe take a dribble, and then smoothly rise up for a jumper that seems effortless. While as a scorer, Bron’s game is all brawn, Melo\u2019s game is mellow and finesse-based.<\/p>\n It seems to be perceived that Kobe Bryant is the player you want on your team in the final minutes of a close game, and he is often referred to as the Closer because of this (Kyra Sedgwick owes him money). But a recent article by Henry Abbott<\/a> proved that while Kobe may have a bounty of last-second game winners, as a whole he tends to bring down his team in the clutch. In the late stages of the game, the Lakers will run a different, more Kobe-centric offence, and that can hurt the team. Abbott shows that Carmelo Anthony\u2019s crunch time statistics are actually the best of any active NBA player. Kobe Bryant is often loudly called an assassin (normally by Kevin Harlan) for his late-game heroics, but he\u2019s more like a magician. The last-second successes effectively cause his previous errors to disappear, allowing him to maintain his Closer moniker. The first three quarters are the pledge, the beginning of the last quarter the turn, and his final shot is often the prestige. Maybe we should call him the Great D’Anton instead.<\/p>\n