<\/a><\/p>\nWhen Young Adult was released in late 2011, I enjoyed it thoroughly, very excitedly demanding that James and I do a podcast about a film I felt was soon to be forgotten by culture. It was obvious at the time of its release that Young Adult wasn\u2019t going to make a dent, but it was equally obvious that the film was going to stick with me over time.<\/p>\n
In our eventual podcast, recorded in April 2012, I believe I focused more on the external aspects of the world helping Mavis to continue her own delusions than the internal aspects of her character. I talked a lot about the Kardashians and reality television, because reality television is the first sound we hear in this movie, and it\u2019s a motif used repeatedly in relation to Mavis. (She watches reality TV four times: a clip of a show called Kendra opens the movie, there are two clips of Kourtney and Khloe in Miami or whatever later on, and there is a brief look at some singing competition.)<\/p>\n
The movie\u2019s lynchpin scene is one with Matt\u2019s sister Sandra, the morning after Mavis\u2019 breakdown at Buddy and Beth\u2019s party. Mavis has finally accepted that she might be the problem \u2013 \u201cI need to change, Sandra\u201d \u2013 before Sandra explains to her that she\u2019s the only cool person from Mercury. Everybody here, Sandra says, is fat and dumb. Mavis is the cool one who got out, the only one who is living a dream existence.<\/p>\n
In her moment of need, Mavis found what could keep her how she is: external confirmation of what she hoped was true, that she was the beautiful and unique snowflake, a distinction that makes you unlikeable in high school but is never going to be assumed to destroy your life (assuming the teenager grows out of said thoughts about themselves). Mavis was in the wind, waiting to be directed in a positive direction before being guided backwards by the first voice that confirmed her unhealthy desires.<\/p>\n
I have not listened to this podcast since we recorded it \u2013 listening to an hour of my own voice would be a very Mavis thing to do \u2013 but having recorded it in Spring 2012, I\u2019m certain that was my take. Mavis is a villain, and Sandra is her cheerleader, there to remind Mavis that it is indeed okay to live like this. The Kardashian family was reaching a sort of nadir in my world at the time – Kanye West, somebody I\u2019m mildly obsessed with, began publicly dating Kim Kardashian right around the time of this podcast \u2013 and therefore that is the aspect of the film I chose to examine. Plus, I was six years younger, six years more willing to ignore the internal in favour of external. It makes sense that this is where my head was at during that period: of course it was the fault of others, because it\u2019s never your fault.<\/p>\n
Today, I find myself focusing more on the internal journey Mavis goes through over the course of the movie, and all the various facial cues the movie relies upon Theron to convey to the audience. Until that climactic breakfast conversation, there are no monologue-length confessions from Mavis about how she feels the need to change (merely a brief admission to her parents that she is an alcoholic, an admission that promptly gets laughed off). The most prominent Theron face journey happens when Beth\u2019s band Nipple Confusion starts performing Mavis\u2019 favourite Teenage Fanclub song, leading Mavis to have her own silent calamitous moment before downing her drink and saying some super weird shit to Buddy. These are Mavis\u2019 brief moments of humanity, moments she shuts out by chugging alcohol. And when the alcohol is swapped for coffee, the extinguishing is left to those around her.<\/p>\n
The final morning of the movie is meant to mirror elements of Mavis\u2019 life in the Minny Apple: she wakes up with a man\u2019s arm draped across her body, and gets out of bed to go sit across the table from and have coffee with another woman. In the Mercury morning, Mavis briefly offers Sandra coffee before essentially being told that she is not the type of person who should be getting somebody else coffee. In Minneapolis, her French fry feasting friend sarcastically ribs Mavis\u2019 words without her realizing, while in Mercury, Mavis is actively told her concerns about her failures are unwarranted. Mavis heads to her hotel to pick up her stuff and have a donut-related confrontation, before shipping out to a diner to finish her book.<\/p>\n
Throughout the movie, we see Mavis putting herself above everybody around her, existing in a rarefied air alone, with only Buddy invited to join her in the cloud paradise. When Buddy tells Mavis that Beth is the drummer in Nipple Confusion, Mavis responds by saying that\u2019s embarrassing, because there is nothing Mavis would want less than to be at the back of the stage. Of course, nobody is truly successful alone; every band needs somebody to keep time, to help them keep track of where they are. The extreme close ups of the cassette in the deck of Mavis\u2019 Mini Cooper serve a similar purpose: this cassette isn\u2019t a singular superstar making her favourite song come through the speakers, it\u2019s a bunch of cogs coming together. There is no individual here, instead a collection of spools and magnetic tape.<\/p>\n
A\u00a0key distinction pervades throughout the movie, one that Mavis seems unwilling or unable to make about her own life, even in her own head: she is a ghostwriter. She is a successful writer, sure, but only because of the road Jane McMurray set out for her. Mavis gets to write her stories, but only if they fall in line with the large Waverly Prep series bible on the shelf above her desk. Mavis\u2019 name is not the biggest type on the cover; it\u2019s not even bolded. (At one point in the movie, Mavis casually mentions to Beth that she is only a ghostwriter, but even that reeks of a politeness power move over Beth more than actual humility.) Mavis is a drummer in her own professional existence, keeping time for the person on the front cover, no matter how embarrassing she might think that is.<\/p>\n
One of the more enjoyable \u2013 and admittedly obvious \u2013 gadgets of Young Adult\u2019s screenplay involves the moments in the film where Mavis is writing her final Waverly Prep book. The main character, Kendal Strickland, is an obvious stand-in for Mavis\u2019 feelings on herself: somebody who could get voted prom queen even though somebody from the school had recently died. These narration scenes are mostly played to comedic effect, to show an inner monologue without actually using an inner monologue, or for showing how Mavis comes up with the great term \u2018textual chemistry.\u2019 The end of the film though \u2013 and therefore the end of the book \u2013 sees Mavis saying goodbye to Buddy Slade (hopefully) once and for all. The book version of Buddy and his girlfriend go out to sea \u2013 \u201cWho could have imagined when Ryan and his girlfriend set sail that day, it would be the last time anyone ever saw them?\u201d \u2013 never to be seen again. And then Mavis goes out to look at her fractured Mini, to decide where she goes next.<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nEnough time has passed that something I once viewed as primarily a comedy about what the world turns us into can now be seen as a tragedy about what we turn ourselves into. Nobody is going to help you, the movie says: the only person who will talk to you wants to have sex with you, and that same person\u2019s sister wants to be you. The end of Young Adult isn\u2019t necessarily decisive, but judging by a brief but all-important Theron face journey, I can\u2019t imagine many viewing it as a positive ending, an exception being (possibly) Mavis. She has finally gotten to a point where she is able to accept things might be her fault \u2013 admitting her alcoholism, confessing to the insanity of her plan to get Buddy back \u2013 but in each instance the person she talks to laughs her off. Mavis finishes the book with a paragraph about how Kendal is graduating from Waverly Prep, steps out of the diner, stares at her broken car (a battered transportation device, no less), and gets in it as the film cuts to black. We don\u2019t see if she listens to Teenage Fanclub as she drives away, or if her best days really are ahead of her. She finally has her own voice to listen to, and we\u2019ll never see where that drives her. One can make their assumptions though.<\/p>\n
Every time I watch this film, I wonder if Diablo Cody feels this ending is a hopeful one. I won\u2019t project for her, for all the obvious reasons, but my guess would be that she does see it as hopeful. The process of writing tends to be inspired by wanting to analyze something that has been bothering you in the hopes of being able to move on from it. Mere consumption and the pessimistic conclusions that can come with it are typically left to the viewer (or maybe Charlie Kaufman). Writing is for stewing in something before moving past it, while the static process of consuming merely encourages the stew portion of things. Frequently writers will describe a seemingly pessimistic ending as one that is hopeful in their eyes, because they want to believe the person or concept they have spent so much time thinking about will work out okay. It might, but it also might not.<\/p>\n
One of Jason Reitman\u2019s most subtly intriguing directorial choices\u00a0in Young Adult is found within the use of its score. In the opening seven-and-a-half minutes of watching Mavis at home in the Minny Apple, none of Rolfe Kent\u2019s score is employed, and we are left to watch Mavis with only diegetic sound to accompany us. The second Mavis decides to head to Mercury, however, the score begins and she packs her bag to begin the well-trodden coming home narrative. We lose the sound of reality and enter the world of the cinematic construction, because that\u2019s where Mavis is driving us.<\/p>\n
When Mavis is standing in front of her car in the final scene of the movie, having just completed her novel, the score fades away, leaving Mavis once again alone in the stark silence of reality. Will the music start again, or will she hear what is around her? No answer is given, because there is never an answer given.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Alex writes about the 2011 film Young Adult.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":6141,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[585,617,587],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6139"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6139"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6147,"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6139\/revisions\/6147"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/themacguffinmen.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}